I like it. I've never really liked the separate syntax, although I understand why it's there. A lot of folks have been confused by that before. It's best that we try to make it as intuitive as possible.
-----Original Message----- From: Knut Wannheden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 8:41 AM To: HiveMind Dev List Subject: usage of smart translator in object provider All, I am working on the <assembly> stuff we've been discussing. An idea was that we'd only have a <set> element instead of both a <set> and a <set-object> element. Here I was wondering what you guys think about the following modification to the "object" translator: If the input value to be translated isn't in the object provider "prefix:locator" form (i.e. doesn't include a colon) then the "object" translator will delegate to the "smart" translator instead. This would allow translating input values like "99" to an int, etc. --knut
