OK, I just thought that these Natures you had also were in the ServicePointDefinition objects.
Cheers, --knut On 8/30/06, Achim Hügen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Previously all information from the definition object was just copied to the service point. Since I needed even more data from the definition in the service point (to simplify the constructor interfaces) I decided to remove the redundancy. I don't expect a memory overhead. Achim Knut Wannheden schrieb: > Achim, > > On 8/30/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Author: ahuegen >> Date: Wed Aug 30 00:48:57 2006 >> New Revision: 438412 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=438412&view=rev >> Log: >> ServicePointImpl keeps a reference to ServicePointDefinition >> > > I have unfortunately not been able to follow the latest developments > in your experimental branch that closely but this one caught my > attention. If I understand this correctly then the internal runtime > ServicePointImpl object will keep a reference to the > ServicePointDefinition object describing it. Will this reference be > unset once the runtime service object has been properly initialized? > Or will this reference remain in which case the definition object and > everything it references could never be garbage collected? > > Regards, > > --knut > >
