Hello,
Couldn't agree more.
After using Hivemind over the last 4 years in many projects, I can say I
have no wish list for feature improvements at the moment. It could use
better documentation but once you start using it , it simply works.
I really don't believe using annotations as was planned for Hivemind 2.0
would be a big improvement in the way it works, maybe quite the
opposite. So I believe this project, while no longer in active
development, is far from dead.
Regards,
- Juliano
Johan Maasing wrote:
We use hivemind in our web portal, serving a lot of customers. So I
would say that our organization is pretty dependent on hivemind and we
are slowly increasing the use of hivemind to wire together frameworks,
both web-portals, plain java applications and webservice frameworks.
So why are we not involved in developing hivemind further?
Because "it just works". We have no big problems with hivemind, it has
all the features we need. The configuration and contribution-trick in
hivemind is a killer feature, I know no way to do the same thing as
easily in spring, guice or the others. Perhaps there is but I don't
know how. So for us hivemind is a very nice tool that just works.
So the hivemind project on apache might be slow and appear dead but
that shouldn't stop you from using it. It is mature, tested in battle
and works.
Cheers,
Johan
2008/11/18 James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
HiveMind hasn't been in active development for quite some time.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:19 AM, fan_42 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just stumbled up HiveMind.
it sound interesting to me, but is it dead or is it on hold?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/-DISCUSS---REPORT--HiveMind-November-2008-tp20437346p20561587.html
Sent from the HiveMind - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
