Thanks for all the valuable input!

I think the consensus has been reached that it is a good idea to do, so
let's push forward and start implementing.

I created a jira ticket to track the progress:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-2115

Hans

On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:25 PM Brandon Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:

> It will be nice to see consistency across the project; better now than
> later.
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 5:17 AM <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, it's the ideal point to reformat the code ;)
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > François
> > [email protected]
> >
> > Le 12/10/2020 à 11:05, Maximilian Michels a écrit :
> > > +1 to Spotless, Checkstyle, and RAT.
> > >
> > > Spotless is great for having a consistent style in the code.
> > > Checkstyle is good for enforcing code standards like class level
> > > comments. Rat is useful for license checks.
> > >
> > > Concerning the formatting changes, I think this is the ideal point in
> > > time to reformat the code. Yes, it comes with some obfuscation of the
> > > Git history but IMHO it's worth it.
> > >
> > > -Max
> > >
> > > On 10.10.20 15:51, [email protected] wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> For Apache project, we are using the apache-pom-parent:
> > >>
> > >> https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/blob/master/pom.xml
> > >> <https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/blob/master/pom.xml>
> > >>
> > >> There is some usefull plugin definition as rat and release profile.
> > >>
> > >> We can add a quality check maven profile in our CI and a documentation
> > >> in the contribution page for the users to help them to validate their
> > >> PRs locally.
> > >>
> > >> For the spotless maven plugin, I already used it in some project but
> at
> > >> the init. We have to keep in mind that the first time we will run it,
> it
> > >> will update all of the code source, so it can be hard to check some
> diff
> > >> between new and old PRs.
> > >>
> > >> Just my 2cts ;)
> > >>
> > >> regards,
> > >>
> > >> François
> > >> [email protected]
> > >>
> > >> Le 10/10/2020 à 15:20, Hans Van Akelyen a écrit :
> > >>> Hi All,
> > >>>
> > >>> We have received some questions about code style and formatting.
> > >>> Currently
> > >>> we do not have guidelines for code style and haven't really been
> > >>> thinking
> > >>> about this yet. To increase our code quality and lower the bar for
> > >>> contributions, developer guidelines should be created as soon as
> > >>> possible.
> > >>>
> > >>> A proposal has come in the form of a PR [1] to implement the
> > >>> spotless maven
> > >>> plugin, this plugin can be used to format code using the Google java
> > >>> style
> > >>> guide [2] and also add the correct header to a file.
> > >>>
> > >>> This plugin combined with formatter plugins for Eclipse and Intellij
> > >>> [3]
> > >>> allows all developers to format code in the same way, avoiding PR
> merge
> > >>> hell because the formatting of the files changed.
> > >>>
> > >>> We can then also include/activate checkstyle and RAT maven plugins
> > >>> in our
> > >>> PR CI builds to check if the code passes our coding standards.
> > >>>
> > >>> This mail is to see if there are objections against using Google
> > >>> java style
> > >>> guide, if there are no objections we will move forward to test if
> > >>> all works
> > >>> as expected, write up a developer guide and do an initial
> > >>> check/format of
> > >>> all our code.
> > >>>
> > >>> Hans
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://github.com/project-hop/hop/pull/290
> > >>> [2] https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html
> > >>> [3] https://github.com/google/google-java-format
> > >>>
> >
>

Reply via email to