I think that a Docker image would be great for our users. However, I think that including Docker artifacts in the first ASF release would be a distraction, and I strongly recommend against it. The first Apache release takes much, much longer than anyone expects, and the delay is due to IP issues (like incorrectly worded NOTICE files). Remember that in the ASF, a release is a legal transaction (formally giving files to the outside world under a license) much more than it is a product launch.
It is much simpler if the first ASF release is a source-only release (no binary artifacts, Docker or otherwise). If the first release goes really smoothly, we can look to including binary artifacts and Docker images in further releases. Julian Julian On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 12:31 AM Hans Van Akelyen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi François, > > I'm slowly migrating/adding pieces to our build process. Each step usually > requires some interventions from the Apache Infra team so we are working in > small increments. > We used to have a docker snapshot after every build and release tags. I > would like to migrate as it was, and we can go from there for > additional improvements. > > Hoping to start progress on it this week. > > Cheers, > Hans > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 9:19 AM Francois Papon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I saw a discussion on Mattermost about a Hop github project for Docker: > > > > https://github.com/project-hop/hop-docker > > <https://github.com/project-hop/hop-docker> > > > > May be it could be nice to add the first Apache release of Hop in the > > official Apache docker registry: > > > > https://hub.docker.com/u/apache/ <https://hub.docker.com/u/apache/> > > > > Thoughts? > > > > regards, > > > > -- > > François > > [email protected] > > > >
