Sounds good indeed. We're still cleaning up code and fixing things left and right but it 'feels' like we could produce a nice useful release at this point.
Cheers, Matt On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 8:33 AM Bart Maertens <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hans, > > Thanks! A code only release sounds good to me. > Mentors, do you have any input? > > Regards, > Bart > > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 9:43 AM Hans Van Akelyen < > [email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > We have come at a point that we should discuss creating our first Apache > > release version. > > One of our mentors suggested that our first release be a source code only > > release to reduce complexity of the release and to see if our code passes > > the checks done by the IPMC. I suspect that our mentors will also first > > take a good look at this first candidate and point us to possible issues. > > > > We have checked all the dependencies we currently use and have the > > following ticket to do the follow up on work items [1]. Question to the > > mentors, does this have to be included in the release somewhere? release > > notes/disclaimer ? > > > > Another thing that has also already been done is checking all header > files, > > we have a couple of files that will need removal in the future when an > > alternative is created. These files have been listed in the LICENSE file > > [2]. Mentors, is this sufficient? > > > > So to summarize, does everyone feel comfortable with a source only > release > > as a first version? > > And do the mentors see any red flags or have a list somewhere on things > > that are checked, I went over [3] and it looks like we comply. > > > > Cheers, > > Hans > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-2182 > > [2] > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/blob/20aea10eaf497cf1be7251af4e352deb1cc6a53a/LICENSE#L206 > > [3] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > > -- Neo4j Chief Solutions Architect *✉ *[email protected] ☎ +32486972937
