Hi Folks, +0 on keeping versioning going >3.1.X or 3.2 I'll get more involved as the weeks go on. Have a great weekend folks Lewis
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > I think going backwards to 1.0 would be confusing for any existing users. > Maybe make the -incubating releases pickup 3.1.x with the intention of the > first graduated release being 4.0.0. Could be seen as artificially > inflating the version numbers, but I don't think that matters too much. I > assume (prefer) we'll follow the guidelines of semantic versioning. > > -n > > On Friday, December 5, 2014, Colin McCabe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I looked at > > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html#best-practice-versioning > > and it doesn't say whether we need to start at 1. Hmm. > > > > I think either way could work. There is stuff from org.htrace up on > > Maven central, but since we're moving to org.apache.htrace, we won't > > conflict if we choose to go back to 1.0.0. I don't really have any > > preference between 1.0.0 or 4.0.0. > > > > best, > > Colin > > > > On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Stack <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > org.htrace was at 3.0.4 > > > > > > The next release could be 4.0.0. > > > > > > Or we could roll back and make it 1.0.0? > > > > > > Any opinions out there? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > St.Ack > > > -- *Lewis*
