+1 C.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Colin, > My understanding is that none of this is yet established on builds.a.o is > this correct? > https://builds.apache.org/view/H-L/view/HBase/ > Maybe it would be a nice opportunity to get that sorted out as well. > Lewis > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Colin P. McCabe <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Based on the responses in the earlier thread, it sounds like it's >> getting to be about that time again... time for a new HTrace release >> :) >> >> I've been thinking about what we should do with our native build >> artifacts. With Java, we only ever have to build one version of >> everything, since the jar files can run on any architecture and >> supported OS. But we now have a C client (which is only at an alpha >> level of stability, but still...) and the htraced server, which is >> also not Java. >> >> Do we want to do builds of this stuff for the common OS/arch >> configurations? If we did a RHEL6 / x86_64 build and an Ubuntu 12.04 >> / x86_64 build, that would cover most of our users, I think. We could >> also do 32-bit builds, but I don't think anyone is actually using >> 32-bit any more in big data land (and if they are, they need to stop >> :) >> >> This also means we would have 3 downloads available in the next release: >> * Just jar files + source >> * Jar files + source + RHEL6/x86_64 libhtrace.so + htraced >> * Jar files + source + Ubuntu 12.04/x86_64 libhtrace.so + htraced >> >> thoughts? >> >> Colin >> > > > > -- > *Lewis*
