On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> wrote: > There's a joke here about N devs in a room and N opinions that are all > right (and all wrong)!
Isn't the lower bound on the number of opinions at least N^2? > All I'm asking for here is to make it easy for outsiders to contribute. > Having HTrace show up in the mirror is a big step. The next logical thing > is folks will click the fork button. We should be ready to receive the > incoming help; the details of that implementation are less important to me. That's all posible today. > Whatever our individual opinions, GH is a defacto place for developers > these days -- their tools are extremely well socialized. It's a shame to > cut ourselves off from users of that community. I happen to share Colin's > opinions about the inferiority of GH's interface for historical comments (I > personally like gerrit the best of the tools I've used), but that doesn't > mean we should shun it. (I also generally loath JIRA, on par with Elliott's > thoughts). FWIW: I have seen how enabling GH workflow helps increase the # of meaningful contributions coming in. Apache Groovy (incubating) is a prime example of a project that runs as close to pure GH workflow as is possible within ASF. Thanks, Roman.
