That's a good question. I think when the time comes for 4.1, we should just create a new 4.1 branch from master, like we did with 4.0 and the earlier release branches.
The 4.0 branch was never really meant to be long-lived.... having to do lots of backports all the time is annoying. Also there is that "0" in there :) I like the idea of always keeping master in a releaseable state, which making release branches off of master tends to encourage. cheers, Colin On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > From master branch or from the 4.0 branch? (The latter I'd think). > > Master should be 5.0.0? > > Thanks, > St.Ack
