On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > I meant to review this patch, but I accidentally hit the delete key on > the original message. Anyway, that APR_LOCKALL can be APR_INTRAPROCESS. > We're only concerned about safety within our process not across > multiple processes - there is no need to needlessly lock across > processes here. right, thanks, that change is in. > IMHO, the call to ssl_util_thread_setup should be moved to > ssl_init_Child and even potentially surrounded by > #if APR_HAS_THREADS. -- justin why child init rather than module init? i did turn off the locking unless the mpm is threaded. isn't it possible that APR_HAS_THREADS is true even though the mpm is not threaded?
