For better or for worse, there are alot of folks who would prefer to turn
off local error logging completely, and do all logging via a distributed
mechanism. Actually, I was also considering whether it would be better to
do a AP_IMPLEMENT_HOOK_RUN_FIRST, so that you can /truly/ override the
internal logging mechanism safely. Would that fit people's
safety/flexibility concerns better?
George
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Laurie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Apache List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Spread-users] send text to spread group from command
line?]
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >
> > I would. But I have a very good reason. We already have the same
> > basic idea, but done a bit safer. Basically, we have a log_error hook,
> > but it is run at the end of log_error_core, so that we are sure that we
> > always get the error in the error_log, even if we don't get it anyplace
> > else. There are some minor tweaks that should be made to the
> > current hook, because right now it actually sends out too much
> > information, like the timestamp. But, it should handle what George
wants
> > just fine.
>
> I don't see why this is any safer than George's proposal, though -
> indeed, IMO, his is more elegant since it makes it easier for someone
> who really wants to disable the standard error logging to be able to do
> so.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ben.
>
> --
> http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
>
> "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
> doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
>
