Just to file this away where I won't loose it. Unfortuatnely, with buckets, it will
be a danged site difficult to find the win9x invalid operation.
Sort of cute that we bubble up rv's instead of http result codes :(
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.www.servers.ms-windows
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: HTTP response problem on 2.0.24
> It's a network error (32045 - 22000 is 10045, winsock error WSAEOPNOTSUPP).
>
> Now that's odd. But as everything on the ASF site indicates, it really doesn't
> work on Windows 9x (or ME) yet. You were warned.
>
> This is the reason that the huge number of folks offering their 'binaries' irks
> me. Please don't any support on this yet. A beta for Windows NT is in the works
> (likely to be 2.0.25) and a beta on 9x will follow the next month.
>
> But as the group has always indicated, if you can't compile Apache yourself, you
> aren't ready for 2.0 (or, 2.0 isn't ready for you :)
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> "Michael Maclean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:9mebgr$1e261$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hi,
> > Apologies if this is a blindingly obvious problem ;o)
> >
> > I downloaded the Windows binary of Apache 2.0.24 from Jerry Baker's site and
> > installed it onto my 98 First Edition machine, and all seems to be fine. I
> > changed all the @@ lines in httpd.conf to valid values and started the
> > server, and it seemed to work fine. I then changed it to run on port 8080 to
> > avoid messing with my existing 1.3.20 setup. I then started running through
> > the manual pages in the htdocs folder via http://localhost:8080, until I
> > tries to access the /manual/misc/FAQ.html page. When I did this, it came
> > back with a page titled "200 OK" and saying "OK" then "The server
> > encountered an internal error or misconfiguration..." like you get with a
> > 500 error. It only seems to happen with certain pages:
> > /manual/misc/client_block_api.html seems to work fine.
> >
> > Nothing appears in the error log when this happens, but the access log looks
> > like this:
> > 127.0.0.1 - - [27/Aug/2001:21:44:35 +0000] "GET /manual/misc/FAQ.html
> > HTTP/1.1" 32045 119496
> >
> > indicating a 32045 HTTP response code. Anyone have any ideas?
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Michael
> >
> >
>
>
