On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Brian Pane wrote:
> >The only thing I can think of is to add to and check the byte tally
> >at bucket boundaries. We might go over the BYTE_COUNT_THRESHOLD, but
> >the check wouldn't happen on every byte and there wouldn't need to be
> >a bucket split to send along the first part. Is this what you mean?
>
> I think checking on bucket boundaries would be better. And to guard
> against the case where a single bucket might contain 200 MB of data,
> wouldn't it work to just check the bucket size right after the
> apr_bucket_read in find_start_sequence and split the bucket there if
> its size exceeds some reasonable threshold?
Let me second that idea... checking per-bucket would be WAY better IMO.
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
