On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
> I posted this before, but I think Justin distracted everyone by saying
> that he still wanted -X funtionality. That's all fine and dandy, but the
> comments are just plain wrong today, so this patch fixes them.
>
> (Hmmm, I wonder if it's still like this in worker too...)
Committed, though I did a s/it's/its/g; on it. =-)
I'd also love to see a patch that looked for -X on the command line and
exited with an error message to the console saying that -X doesn't exist
anymore and you should consider using -DONE_PROCESS or -DNO_DETACH...
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
