From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 PM > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote: > >... > > exports.c shouldn't be cleaned, correct, because it is a part of the > > distribution, or at least it should be if it isn't already. config.nice is > > not a part of the distribution however, and should be removed by > > make distclean. > > -1 on *any* form of clean that tosses config.nice > > That holds *my* information about how I repeatedly configure Apache. That is > a file that I use, and is outside of the scope of the config/build/whatever > processes. Its entire existence is to retain the information. Cleaning it is > not right. What are you talking about? We are talking about cleaning for packaging to _other_ computers, not yours. That's what rbb is speaking of by 'distclean', clean enough for redistribution. Bill
- [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Charles Randall
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Justin Erenkrantz
- RE: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Charles Randall
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Ryan Bloom
- RE: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Greg Stein
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Greg Stein
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Greg Stein
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Jim Winstead
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Greg Stein
- Re: [PATCH] RE: make distclean doesn't Ryan Bloom