On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > Actually, is anybody on the list (with 2.0 from cvs-HEAD) using
> > cgi/cgid for subrequests, redirects, or error pages? That would be
> > the area of interest.
Using prefork/mod_cgi/mod_include, the results are definitely interesting:
--------------------------------------------------------------
>From a file in the docroot:
<!--#include virtual="index.html.en"--> This works
<!--#include virtual="manual/index.html.en"--> This works
<!--#include virtual="/manual/index.html.en"--> This works
<!--#include virtual="/cgi-bin/printenv"--> This works
<!--#include virtual="/cgi-bin/redir.cgi"--> ASSERT FAILED (see below)
Accessing /cgi-bin/redir.cgi directly This works
>From a file in /modules/include:
<!--#include file="extra/inc-extra1.shtml"--> SEGFAULT (see below)
<!--#include virtual="extra/inc-extra1.shtml"--> This works
Accessing /cgi-bin/error403.cgi directly This works
Trying to access forbidden.html, which is
forbidden, directly (with a CGI ErrorDocument) This works (correctly)
>From a file in docroot:
<!--#include virtual="forbidden.html"--> This works (correctly)
Accessing index.html.en with redir.cgi This works
Accessing printenv with redir.cgi This works
--------------------------------------------------------------
In the above tests, redir.cgi is the following:
#!/usr/bin/perl
print("Location: /manual\n\n");
error403.cgi is this, with the appropriate errordocument directive:
#!/usr/bin/perl
print("Content-type: text/html\n\n");
print("<html><body>Forbidden</body></html>\n");
--------------------------------------------------------------
So two of my tests failed. One is the one we know about, the <!--#include
file ... --> on a file in a different directory, which falls victim to the
INTERNALLY GENERATED thing.
The other is a new one... an assertion failed when I tried to do an
include virtual of redir.cgi:
[Mon Sep 03 22:46:31 2001] file http_protocol.c, line 1171, assertion
"!r->main" failed
[Mon Sep 03 22:46:32 2001] [notice] child pid 7922 exit signal Aborted (6)
All the rest worked! I guess that's relatively good news.
Anything else you'd like me to test?
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charlottesville, VA
