On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:19:50PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote: > Ah, I guess that explains why only a small fraction of pthread_mutex_lock > calls on Solaris seem to result in calls to lwp_mutex_lock: in the fast > case where the lock is available, it just stays in user-mode code? Yes. -- justin
- remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Brian Pane
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Justin Erenkrantz
- mod_include.c WAS: RE: remaining CPU bottlen... Sander Striker
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Greg Stein
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Brian Pane
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Brian Pane
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Ian Holsman
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Aaron Bannert
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 dean gaudet
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Brian Pane
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: remaining CPU bottlenecks in 2.0 Brian Pane
