On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:38:45PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >... > Ryan's veto has effectively tabled this for now. I'm begining to respect > this from the perspective of putting a release in peoples hands. It can > be introduced soon afterwards, or if someone likes, a subproject can be > created. This has been too long people, let's put 2.0 to bed. Some people believe his veto is illegitimate -- that there is no technical reason for vetoing the inclusion into modules/experimental. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS TOKILEY
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS TOKILEY
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Jim Jagielski
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ian Holsman
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Charles Randall
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Greg Stein
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ryan Bloom
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Ben Hyde
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Jim Jagielski
- RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Gomez Henri
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Pier Fumagalli
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Jeff Trawick
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS Graham Leggett
