In a message dated 01-09-15 19:13:06 EDT, Ryan wrote... > > > Wasn't the concensus a while back that request_rec->notes should be > > > removed, because the more efficient 'userdata' functions on r->pool > > > had made the notes table obsolete? > > > > > > --Brian > > > > It was 'discussed' but never played out. > > > > I wouldn't say there was anything near a 'consensus' on > > anything. Only a few people even responsed. > Actually, a consensus was reached. I believe that we even tried to do that > work, but it isn't as easy as it should be, because it is easy to merge a > table, but hard to merge a hash. Roger that. It WILL be harder. All I can say is that 'notes' still works, doesn't seem to be buggy, and comes in handy. Why not just keep it until there's more time to do the work like after 2.0 gets out the door? There has to be some definable 'cut off' point for 2.0 changes. I think the 'userdata versus notes' discussion arose out of the new criteria which seems to have emerged ( Justin says he is now going to insist on it ) that Apache 2.0 be as FAST if not FASTER than 1.3.x before 2.0 ever sees the light of day. I thought the goal decided (long ago) was... 2.0 - Stable and released 2.1 - Address performance issues Yours... Kevin
