I'm sorry - I've transformed the entire schema.
Yes, I'm +1 for the 'real' option A.
My concerns about it remain - folks will download the 'lite' core version, only
to turn around and download the 'full' version.
And yes, something like httpd-complete would be a very nice name.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cliff Woolley"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:28 PM
Subject: Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cliff Woolley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 6:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format
>
>
> > On Tuesday 18 September 2001 04:35 pm, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > > > > o Option A: apache-2.x.x.tar.gz
> > > > >
> > > > > Combines httpd-2.0, apr, apr-util, httpd-proxy and
> > > > > httpd-ldap and produces an apache rollup tree.
> > > >
> > > > +1 on Option A. I think that anything else is going to be too
> > > > confusing for end users.
>
> +1 on Option A.
>
> > > I also prefer option A. My only question is do we really want to start
> > > making a distinction between "apache" and "httpd"? I don't think we do.
> > > How about apache-bundle-2.x.x.tar.gz ?
> >
> > Regardless of how we do the roll-up, nont of our builds should have the
> > word Apache in them. The httpd project is the httpd project. If we use the
> > word Apache, then we are co-opting the Foundation's name, instead of
> > the project name.
>
> _IF_ we adopted option B, it should be httpd-bundle-x.x.x, but it appears the
> people lean for option A. In that case, it should be httpd-core-x.x.x and
> httpd-extra-x.x.x (httpd-modules sounds like we don't include a -single-
> module with httpd-core. httpd-complete or the like sounds like they get the
> whole package, or back to option B.)
>
> In any case, I'm against B for a simple reason. Many folks will grab the core
> sources tarball, turn around, and grab the 'full' tarball. What a waste of
> our servers' bandwidth.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>
