Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format - Score So Far...

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 4:35 PM


> On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 04:32:12PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote:
> 
> > But I think we also have concensus that the name shouldn't be "apache".
> > "apache-httpd-2.x.x.tar.gz" seems better.
> 
> Agreed.

That was my take on things, we made it *really* clear that this can't be
ambigious.

> I am +0 on httpd-2... and +1 on apache-httpd-2...
>
> btw, no dates in those either (a suggestion from otherbill). The version
> number tells us what we need to know.

Not if a module has released an incremental bugfix/securityfix between
major core httpd releases, it doesn't.