On Tuesday 25 September 2001 04:13 pm, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Graham Leggett wrote:
> > The return of mod_proxy to
> > the main tree received the required +1's, and at this stage it seems the
> > best way forward to get progress on getting proxy some much needed
> > testing.
>
> Right now, what is the best way of returning mod_proxy to the tree? Is
> it
>
> a) checking in the latest copy of proxy, relying on the old httpd-proxy
> tree for history.
> b) moving the ,v files across so that history is carried forward into
> httpd-2.0 tree?
B. That history is incredibly important since proxy is basically a complete
re-write for 2.0.
Of course, Greg is likely to disagree with me (this is one of our long-standing
disagreements), so wait for him to respond too, please.
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
