On Monday 01 October 2001 06:06 pm, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote:
It's not hard, but it is just more work for the installation to do, and when we create binary builds, it is one more file that the install script has to remember to sed. If we just use relative paths, then everything just kind of works. Ryan > Oh !!.. that's right :-).. I had the DocumentRoot setup with full path in > the v-host configuration, and hence the confusion.. I thought the > ServerRoot *is* required in setting it up.. > But does it really matter if we have the @@ServerRoot@@ variable in the ssl > configuration file ?.. It should be really simple to 'sed' it to the prefix > that's configured by the user - right ?.. > > -Madhu > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 5:48 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1); > '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: SSL configuration file > > > On Monday 01 October 2001 05:45 pm, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN > (HP-Cupertino,ex1) > > wrote: > > Yes.. exactly.. but is it not required that the httpd-ssl.conf in the CVS > > ?.. Where else would the user get the httpd-ssl.conf from ?.. > > It should be in CVS, but it should be called ssl-std.conf, and it shouldn't > need @@ServerRoot@@ should it? Everything in that config file should be > a relative path, which would default to living under the ServerRoot. > > Ryan > ______________________________________________________________ > Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------- -- ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
