Sander van Zoest wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Mark J Cox wrote: > > >>What we ought to do is to first decide what the XML output is going to >>look like (it'll be a pain to change this later), then it doesn't really >>matter if it's a patch to mod_status or a new module. >> http://www.awe.com/mark/dev/mod_status_xml/example.xml >> > > I like the XML schema, but I would make a few minor adjustments. > > I would specify an httpd.apache.org xml namespace and a charset. > Also spliting up the actual request into method, uri, protocol would it > easier to manipulate those with xpath. > > I would also consider potentially using a different way to handle time such > as NTP Timestamps and adding a numeric time zone. The current method works > perfectly, but to do some mathematical calculations it might be useful to > have it expressed differently. > > I will probably look into running this on my server soon. >
I'm happy with this layout Mark, And I'll volunteer to write the 2.x version of this. we (cnet) are going to use a XML-status The only issue I have with it is that the XML output doesn't really follow the standard HTML one, so it will probably have to duplicate the scorecard logic.. What do the rest of the Apache Ppl think.. should I add this as another module (in experimental) or modify the existing mod_status. Sander, if you can provide me with a sample of the XML you want I'll do that as well. ..Ian > Cheers, > > -- > Sander van Zoest [EMAIL PROTECTED] > High Geek http://Sander.vanZoest.com/ > >
