> -------Original message------- > From Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date 04/11/2001 21:13:07 > > > > As for the installer.sh concept, I'm -0, because I feel it isn't needed. > > As Pier pointed out, there are still almost as many steps with > > installer.sh as doing it manually. Besides, I tend to redo certain parts > > at certain times, so even if installer.sh did all steps at once, it still > > wouldn't help me much. For example, I tend to run variations on make > > clean/distclean/extraclean depending on what I'm doing and how many other > > things have changed in the system in the meanwhile... it's pretty easy to > > do that by hand and I feel it gives me more control over the thing. > > Anyone using a checked-out-from-CVS copy of Apache is probably a > > developer, and yet installer.sh hides the output of > > buildconf/configure/etc, making it harder for the developers to notice any > > problems that might be happening in the build system. > > I agree 100In fact, I am -0.5 for this script. > > Ryan
cool, so... now i will know what kind of things i really need to take out of my mind like building install scripts.. cause i never knew about config.nice thang.... its ok... it was my first try... happens... thanks, regards, hiten pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://geocities.com/hitmaster2k> ______________________________________________________ Free Email - Lycos UK - http://www.lycos.co.uk Get your domain for �9.90 - http://lycos.uk.domainnames.com/default.asp?caller=lycos_ef Play now to win �1 Million - http://www.thedailydraw.com/mainframe.cfm?source=lycos
