Brian Pane wrote: > 3. Keep using apr_table_t for the fields in request_rec, and redesign > the internals of apr_table_t to support O(log(n)) access > Pros: > * Performance improvement for the httpd > * Almost no impact on code that uses APR > Cons: > * Changes required to code that uses apr_table_elts() (on the order > of half a dozen calls in Apache 2.0, and occasional usage in the > handful of large 3rd-party modules that I've checked) > > > Comments?
This seems the best way to go. Perhaps apr_table_elts should be replaced by a set of iterators, like apr_hash_first/next? -- Brane Čibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
