On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > Try this patch on for size (my tree is non-buildable since I synced > up). The thing here is that we walk up the request tree when we see > a non-HTTP_OK code. So, if we were to save the request_rec* BEFORE > we walk up the tree, I think we end up with the correct request_rec > and save some time to boot.
Ahhh, now that's starting to make sense. :) I'm reviewing the patch right now (I still have a version of 2.0.29-dev from this afternoon). I tried Sterling's patch and it worked and passed httpd-test, but I think I like yours better, so I'll try it next and commit it for you if it passes the tests. > FWIW, the only thing I see stopping a beta is a segfault. Anything > else, I don't give a rats ass about. =) And, *especially* if there > is a workaround. Because at this point, 2.0.29-dev is > non-buildable, so I think it is unlikely we can get 2.0.29 out in > a reasonable time-frame. Remember, beta != bug-free. -- justin Agreed. And even if it does build (I haven't tried HEAD), there are still lingering close issues AFAIK. (I keep having to tell myself this, or I lose sight of it. beta != bugfree, beta != bugfree, beta != bugfree...) :) --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
