From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:56 PM


> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > 
> > I know that we can't touch the 2.0.28-alpha tarball, but I seem
> > to recall someone saying we could touch the next-level tarball
> > (i.e. -beta).
> 
> hmmmm...that's an interesting idea.  I like it!  I would bump the tag on
> that file, do the PITA dance with the CHANGES file, probably do a little
> testing, re-roll, rename the tarballs as beta.  What do others think?  I
> could note that this happened in the CHANGES file since I have to mess
> with it anyway.

I'd suggest that you checkout on APACHE-2_0_28, tag as APACHE-2_0_28_ALPHA
for historical reasons, then we can add APACHE-2_0_28_BETA, etc.

BTW - 1.3 had this great little minor rev field that always started at 100.
Shame that's gone.

Bill

Reply via email to