On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 02:05:35PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote: > Are we in violation of section 2? Looks that way to me. License attached for > convenience... Easy enough to fix, if indeed it needs fixing.
Weird, why didn't I see that when I looked at it just two weeks ago? Our README currently contains This package contains software written by Philip Hazel and copyrighted by the University of Cambridge. Please see the file called srclib/pcre/COPYING. and I noted that in my sample NOTICE file in the license discussion. Meanwhile, I'll fix the README. ....Roy
