>>Ryan Bloom wrote: >> >> I don't see why we can't. The code needs to be reviewed >> whether the code is submitted with a name or not.
>Rodent of Unusual Size [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > >One word: liability. Two more: patent infringement. >I think we need some evidence of good faith that the >code isn't encumbered, or else it can't get any closer >than the contrib directory. The accountability of a >reasonable submitter name is far from perfect, but not >as far as that of an anonymous one. :-) Ok, I understand, but do you means I'll have to subscribe directly to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in order to propose some patches ? It make sense to follow [EMAIL PROTECTED] when you're a regular developper and contributor (commiter), but I don't fit in that category today and really have concern on reducing the number of emails I could reasonnabily handle each days. But if it's mandatory, not problem, I'll subscribe to dev list.... - Henri Gomez ___[_]____ EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
