Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What should I use now? worker or perchild
>
> As it says in CHANGES...
>
> *) The threaded MPM for Unix has been removed. Use the worker
> MPM instead. [various]
>
> > Would it be possible to check the given parameter --with-mpm against the
> > supported mpm implementations?
>
> Sure, that sounds very nice. How about posting a patch to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] :) ?
Done :))
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Jeff
>
> --
> Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Index: ./server/mpm/config.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/apache/httpd-2.0/server/mpm/config.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -r1.39 config.m4
--- ./server/mpm/config.m4 2001/11/19 18:07:28 1.39
+++ ./server/mpm/config.m4 2001/11/21 16:24:35
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
apache_cv_mpm=prefork
fi
fi
+if test ! -f "server/mpm/$apache_cv_mpm/mpm.h"; then
+ AC_MSG_ERROR(the selected mpm: $apache_cv_mpm is not supported)
+fi
APACHE_FAST_OUTPUT(server/mpm/Makefile)
