On Wednesday 21 November 2001 05:26 pm, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1) wrote: > So, is the patch a "-1" ?..
Not from me. I think the patch is important, but there are other bugs there as well. Ryan > > -Madhu > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:02 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile.in > > On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > Especially with all the linkages, if mod_ssl is an so, you have the > > massive > > > > overhead of resolving all the libssl/libeay sorts of symbols just to > > load > > > > a module that's never used. That is brokenness. > > > > I can agree with this (it takes noticably long to start the server > > with mod_ssl loaded). > > I'd wager that a good deal of that time is spent waiting for enough > entropy to be gathered to seed the PRNG, not just in dynamic linking. > > --Cliff > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Cliff Woolley > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Charlottesville, VA -- ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
