On Fri, Nov 23, 2001 at 09:48:49PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > Which make me think about including APR, EXPAT and all > > in Apache 2.0. > > > > Latest release (2.0.28beta) make apr, expat as shared libs. > > Could we imagine configuring and building Apache 2.0 with > > apr/expat as external shared libs ie : > > > > --with-apr-lib= > > --with-apr-include= > > > > --with-expat-lib= > > --with-expat-include= > > > > Could we also imagine to have expat.h and apr_*.h in > > expat and apr include dir ??? > > I think the proper thing is trying to get proper layout > support into APR and APR-util. And, we can also do that with > expat as well and contribute back to them (Greg Stein has commit > access to expat and can help facilitate contributions back to > expat). > > I absolutely disagree with your patch for J-T-C about this. > But, I'm not a committer there, so I am impotent. =)
Well, I did a patch to do this, but it was bounced with some minor fixups that I was too busy to make during exams; I really should go back, fix up and resubmit. > > I attached my spec file and also patch to make Apache 2.0 Beta28 > > more FHS compliant.... > > Can you contribute stuff to the layout to help this? > > Furthermore, most of the stuff in your patch has already been > committed (except for the apachectl fix which is awful to get > right). Madhu submitted a change to ssl-std.conf to do the same > thing as your HAVE_SSL change, but instead relies on the standard > SSL define (which apachectl passes in with -DSSL). -- justin IMHO there is No One Solution to apache2ctl that will solve the problem for ASF, RH and Debian. (Not to mention all the other distributors). -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <rhowe> Mike_: Either you're wrong or the motherboard manufacturer wants raping by a donkey
