"Roy T. Fielding" wrote: > > Good idea -- I was trying to keep the most relevant part of the name > at the front so that it is easy to find in the documentation, but > FileETagValue is better than the alternatives. Actually, just FileETag > (with one option being "none") would be best.
And how should 'FileETag None' be interpreted? As no ETag at all, or a blank one, or what? (null), '[W/]""', or something else? The former (omit the ETag field from the response header) will require a MMN bump, even though it seems to match the keyword intent more closely.. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
