Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:20:59AM -0800, Brian Pane wrote: > >>>You mean !r->main right? assbackwards is for HTTP/0.9, IIRC. >>> >>It's also set for subrequests, though >> > >Why wouldn't we want it to be !r->main? Isn't that the best way >to check for subrequests? I'm missing something here. -- justin >
I think either would work. The conditional that I'm trying to implement is: "if (we should be setting a response header)". Using "if (!r->assbackwards)" just seems like a more direct approximation of that than "if (!r->main)". --Brian
