On Monday 24 December 2001 03:58 am, David Reid wrote: > This is defined, but how about we rename it to something without the unixd_ > portion so that it's simply a more generic os function, something like > ap_os_accept? I ask as I added a beosd_accept and that seems a little > clumsy as in the worker MPM I have to then add a series of #if's to get the > function used, so simply having an ap_os_accept would solve the problem and > seems like an easier way to go. > > This also seems to apply for some other defines and functions. > > The definition could even be moved to a more central less os specific > setting... > > Thoughts?
I have no problem with doing this, but we need to keep this logic out of the main server. The whole point of the unixd_* functions is that they don't make any sense for Windows, and possibly for OS/2. If you can use all or even most of those functions, then why don't you just rename your platform to unixd, and abstract out the differences. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
