Cliff Woolley wrote: > Anybody have preferences as to what I name the field I'm adding to the > conn_rec to store the apr_bucket_alloc_t*? It's used _everywhere_, so > short and sweet would be preferable. Right now in the patch it's called > c->balloc, but that seems a bit wonky. At least it's unique enough that I > can search-and-replace it with something else easily. ;-) Ideas? A > couple of people have suggested the more verbose c->bucket_alloc or > something like that, but this really is used _everywhere_. The less > obtrusive, the better. Too bad there's nothing as succinct as "c->pool" > that we could name it... that would be ideal. What about c->bmemsys or > something? Ideas?
I personally like bucket_alloc It might be a bit long, but it is descriptive, and people will can understand exactly what it is about by looking at the name > > --Cliff > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Cliff Woolley > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Charlottesville, VA > > >
