William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: ... >However, can we find a way to make AP_NUM_WALK_CACHES a bit more flexible? > >See, for example, mod_proxy. We are doing the same bit there. Would you >mind extending your patch to allow registration [at startup] of other >cache members? This could be used for walk caches, or for other sorts of >per-request cached data that currently resides in notes (and should reside >in userdata, until you pointed out how slow that solution really is.) >
I like the registration idea. I'll work out an API for it sometime this week. --Brian
