Huh, we just move the pool for logfiles... Not sure if that qualifies as a workaround.
Commit on the way. david ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 3:57 PM Subject: Re: plog for log files? > "David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Jeff, > > > > I think the problem lies in the way that we deal with stderr. basically > > with threaded freeBSD we have the kernel signal pipe looking at stderr and > > thus always returning 1, even though there is no signal there to process > > (this has been checked by both justie and myself). > > FreeBSD bug... > > > Anyway, if this won't hurt anything then is there any objection to doing it? > > If there isn't, and given it will cure one bug, I'll commit. > > I don't want to see us putting in a lot of work-arounds for FreeBSD > snafus. > > If as far as we know just about everything else in threaded Apache > works fine on FreeBSD with this patch, then go for it. > > If this is just one of various outstanding issues, adding the > work-around to CVS removes a testcase for anybody wanting to get > FreeBSD threading up-to-snuff and it doesn't make Apache work > reliably anyway. > > -- > Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site: > http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/ > Born in Roswell... married an alien... >
