Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:20:40PM -0800, Brian Pane wrote: > > Don't we already know that it's not beta-quality, based on the > > problems with 2.0.30 on daedalus? > > I thought that the problems on daedalus were related to CGIs > reading one char at a time? Wouldn't a simple change to make > the CGIs use buffering (at the APR-level) solve this? -- justin
The CGI problem also happens in 2_0_28, which doesn't experience the high load averages and big CPU spikes. We don't know yet what's doing it. I just had 2.0.29 up for a while, and it also has high load averages, so whatever it is happened between _28 and .29. Greg
