Oops... I guess I didn't see that veto. Sorry 'bout that.
Do you prefer that I back out that whole section (since the addition
of the pthread mutex must be disabled if we back out just the below)
or keep this, with the understanding that if it's not addressed
within X days, we back it out then?
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Index: http_main.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/main/http_main.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.569
> > retrieving revision 1.570
> > diff -u -r1.569 -r1.570
> > --- http_main.c 16 Jan 2002 19:36:23 -0000 1.569
> > +++ http_main.c 17 Jan 2002 13:20:51 -0000 1.570
> > @@ -662,11 +662,16 @@
> > perror("pthread_mutexattr_init");
> > exit(APEXIT_INIT);
> > }
> > +#if !defined(CYGWIN)
> > + /* Cygwin has problems with this pthread call claiming that these
> > + * are "Invalid arguements", Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > + */
> > if ((errno = pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&mattr,
> > PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED))) {
> > perror("pthread_mutexattr_setpshared");
> > exit(APEXIT_INIT);
> > }
> > +#endif
>
> Isn't this what I veto-ed yesterday until Stipe can answer a question
> I had? (answer: "yes") I thought I made a very simple, fair request.
> See the message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> The answer to my question needs to be clarified in the comments.
> Spell-checking would be nice too, though I wouldn't consider that a
> requirement for removing the veto :)
>
> --
> Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
will lose both and deserve neither"
