William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:36 AM > > >>Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >>>the plan is to roll within 48 hours if nothing major breaks (which >>>can't be fixed in the tag) >>> >>It looks like I need to veto/back-out Martin's change to getnameinfo() >>error reporting down in APR since he apparently didn't have time to >>help sort out what is going on there. It did work* on some platforms >>before; AFAIK it doesn't work on any platforms now. That seems like a >>candidate for moving the tag (sa_common.c). Any concerns? >>
OK. I'll fix the tag on unix/sa_common.c so that .31 points to revision 1.49 (which was checked in 5:21 today please hollar if thats wrong (like I need to ask for you guys to object... heh) > > Yes, this makes sense to roll out of .31. As a beta, it would make it > much more difficult to debug user error reports (that shouldn't need to > be filed in the first place.) > > > >>*work: return error codes to the APR app that can be understood by >>apr_strerror(); there's no question that before/after the app can at >>least find out whether or not it worked >> > >
