Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 11:10:41PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote: > > Has anyone tested this stuff on a system with Berkely DB? I would think that > > would be a logical thing to do before yanking mod_auth_db. > > FreeBSD's variant wasn't detected (I have to use BDB 4.0.14 for SVN, > so I never use anything else).
Thanks! I think you're saying that you tested some variant of Berkely DB, so I feel much better about this change. > If you are interested, you can use testdbm in apr-util/test like so: > > testdbm -t DB cat /home/apmail/bugdbaccounts I'm definately interested. > to ensure that apr-util can read it correctly. And, if apr-util > can read it, mod_auth_dbm better be able to. =) I tested with > testdbm on daedalus, so we should be fine there. beautyous :) :) > What would be a timeframe to try to go back to .31 with this > fix in? my top priorities: 1. insure the bug db stuff works post-.31 2. check out the new flavor of core dump Jeff moved into /usr/local/apache2_0_31.patched/corefiles 3. torture test the input side code with prematurely closed connections 4. get .31 + new patches running live on daedalus 5. think about how we can re-tag a stable set of code similar to that in step 4 > As you can tell, we need the feedback, *but* we are > getting a rather quick turnaround on any problems. =) yep...I definately appreciate your efforts, and hope you got enough sleep last nite and/or coffee today :) Greg
