On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:54:26PM -0500, Greg Ames wrote: > I copied all the patches I have on my newest daedalus build to > http://www.apache.org/~gregames/ . The patches ending with .31.patch should > very closely resemble committed patches. Other than that, save_input.patch is > the usual debugging patch, and enfile.patch is to allow the child to gracefully > exit without killing the parent if accept() gets ENFILE. > > I plan to reconcile these RSN.
I will take a look at merging in anything you have that I don't into my tree tonight (I have some homework I need to finish, so I may not get to it for a bit). If you beat me to the reconciliation, then please post it and I'll review it. Let's try to get consistent on what additions we are making to .31+. =) > > I could tag this as JRE_1 or something, but I'd need to branch > > out server/core.c to remove 1.143. I think this is doable, but > > I'd like feedback on what we think of that, and to know what else > > we want to add. > > I'm assuming if JRE_1 looks like a keeper, we can merge the branch back into > mainline and create a public tag out of it. ++1 if so. I don't think we'd need to "merge" it back in as all we'd have to do is tag APACHE_2_0_32 to be the same as JRE_1 if the group approves it. Any fixes go back into HEAD not this dead-end branch. -- justin
