How about the configure.in fix for HPUX 11i - would you be bumping the tag for that file also ??.. If not, then something has to go into the README file because .31 will not work as-is on a HPUX 11i system..
Thanks -Madhu -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS jerenkrantz 02/02/08 09:15:02 Modified: . STATUS Log: Explain why I'm sitting on .32. Revision Changes Path 1.490 +10 -1 httpd-2.0/STATUS Index: STATUS =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/STATUS,v retrieving revision 1.489 retrieving revision 1.490 diff -u -r1.489 -r1.490 --- STATUS 7 Feb 2002 23:01:47 -0000 1.489 +++ STATUS 8 Feb 2002 17:15:01 -0000 1.490 @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- -Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/07 23:01:47 $] +Last modified at [$Date: 2002/02/08 17:15:01 $] Release: @@ -41,6 +41,15 @@ CURRENT RELEASE NOTES: + + * 32 status: + Justin is waiting for Win32 to become functional. As potential + RM for .32, he considers it a showstopper. Once Win32 is + operational (per EitherBills), .32 will be rolled. If the group + thinks that we could have a good beta without Win32 support, please + note so here. If a majority agree that Win32 is not required for + a beta, Justin will roll .32 ASAP. (And, if you agree with the + fact that Win32 is a showstopper, please note that here too.) * Proposed BETA possibilities 31 + fixes for all resolved problems and call it 32 (instead of HEAD)
