"Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I received 3 +1s to make JRE_1 .32, so it became 2.0.32 (with a
> CVS tag of APACHE_2_0_32).
> 
> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/httpd-2.0.32-alpha.tar.gz
> 
> Committers and non-committers, please vote for beta from this
> tarball.  Once it is approved as a beta, the formal release notes
> will be made with appropriate posts to current-testers and other
> places as required.
> 
> Since I need 3 +1s for .32 to call it beta, I placed it up as an
> alpha (2 +1s so far for beta).  I'm certainly hopeful that this
> will be a beta shortly.  (If you dare vote -1 and you didn't
> test JRE_1 when I asked for feedback, I will come after you with
> a baseball bat.)
> 
> This build has been running on daedalus for over three days now
> (with one minor tweak that is in this release for mod_negotiation),
> so I believe it has passed our dog food test, but Greg Ames has the
> final word on daedalus's vote.
> 
> Some random notes:
> 
> - autoconf 2.13 and libtool 1.4.2 were used to generate the .gz
> tarball.  IMHO, if this combination doesn't work on your platform,
> then you need to run ./buildconf yourself.  I don't particularly
> care to roll tarballs for every oddball platform.
> 
> - I hacked httpd_roll_release to leave in ".", so the tarball
> produces httpd-2.0.32 directory when extracted.
> 
> - Because I wanted libtool 1.4.2 for the .tar.gz, I rolled it on my
> local Linux box.  However, that box doesn't have compress, so I
> couldn't post .Z files.  If someone needs them, I'm hoping someone
> can volunteer to post a good .Z file.  (The same goes for Win32 and
> .zip files.)
> 
> - Since I can not recommend .31 now (and I believe none of us can
> either), I removed those files from /dist/httpd/ since it now has
> been obsoleted by .32.  I hope this is/was correct policy.
> 
> - I've tested this with httpd-test and all the tests pass (even
> negotiation suprisingly enough!).  (I have heard sporadic reports
> of failures with httpd-test, but I can *not* reproduce any of
> them.)

Apart from the little glibtool note, it compiles and runs fine with the
WORKER MPM under OS/X 10.1.2 (Darwin Kernel Version 5.2) :)

Thankuouuuuuuuuu !!! :)

    Pier

Reply via email to