Cliff Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
>
> > I have one concern about 2.0.32 as a GA candidate.
> > In order to fix the last of the performance problems
> > in 2.0.x, we'll need to incorporate free lists for
> > buckets (the stuff that Cliff is working on).
>
> I have another: I consider the existence of APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE a GA
> showstopper. We just cannot let filter developers think that clearing out
> a brigade of zero-length buckets is at all kosher IMO. Yet another thing
> I have to dig back into this coming week...
It is easy to prevent people from doing the same thing without
changing the generated code (move the macro to core.c, rename it to
ONLY_LAME_CODE_NEEDS_TO_REMOVE_ZERO_LENGTH_BUCKETS(), whatever floats
your boat). Showstopper? No, IMHO. Something to clean up? Sure.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
