"Sascha Schumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>
>> "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> It appears to me that we are running into a *lot* of problems in
>>> (GNU)libtool on OS X and that the libtool guys would appreciate
>>> the feedback. Yet, it appears that stuff sent to them never gets
>>> included in... has that been other's experience as well?
>
> Absolutely not. All my patches for libtool (often for
> esoteric platforms) have been included in a timely manner so
> far.
>
>> I sent it several times, never seen a new release coming out with fixes...
>> Gave up :( I have my own patched copy...
>
> Apparently those patches were misdirected, because there are
> no signs of them in the archive of the mailing lists
> (I grepped through libtool, libtool-patches).
Who knows... I sent them over to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If you prefer that, I could resubmit those patches. Just let
> me know what needs to be submitted..
Maybe they don't like me :) Attached is my message sent to this list last
week about it, with the changes required to compile cleanly 2.0.32
Pier
--- Begin Message ---
"Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone seen this before? Libtool 1.4.2 doesn't work on OS/X and the modules
> produced with Apache 2.0 are actually DYLIB(s) and not MH_BUNDLE(s), thus
> preventing the APR routines to read them...
>
> There seems to be a screwup with glibtool's -module parameter...
Gotcha... Do a search for "xyes" and you will see something like
archive_cmds="\$nonopt \$(test \\"x\$module\\" = xyes && echo -bundle...
This has to be exchanged into
archive_cmds="\$nonopt \$(test \"x\$module\" = xyes && echo -bundle...
To make it work... Any chance we can do something with it? :)
Pier
--- End Message ---
