Aaron Bannert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 02:43:04PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > > It is my understanding that FIN_WAIT_2 happens on the client side after
> > > the client does an active close but before the server does a close. If
> > > the server process died I'd expect the OS to send a FIN back to the
> > > client, so perhaps you have child processes that never died off from the
> > > previous generation? On that theory, you would have 177 connections in
> > > CLOSE_WAIT on the server.
> >
> > yep, of course you're absolutely right...
>
> If you do indeed have connections hanging around on the server stuck
> in CLOSE_WAIT after a graceful, then we probably have a bug in our
> graceful restart code. Was this the case, or did they eventually go
> away?
For the moment I'm assuming that it is a bug in the tool I was using.
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
